tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24847372381391643472012-02-16T01:55:16.833-08:00that's Latin, darlin' ;)Beloved in the Lordnoreply@blogger.comBlogger51100tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2484737238139164347.post-61505162365619101842009-10-21T13:05:00.001-07:002009-10-21T13:18:08.271-07:00

Did you know, that any word with "lib" in it (liberty, liberal, libertarian, liberation, ad lib...) refers to freedom (it's Latin, darlin' :D)? Don't you find it ironic (and all the more proof that liberals are liars), that those on the "left" consider themselves "liberals"??? They abhor freedom! They think we, the American people, are a bunch of ignorant rednecks who can't be trusted to make

Beloved in the Lordnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2484737238139164347.post-59102851416140302652009-10-21T12:39:00.001-07:002009-10-21T12:52:06.519-07:00

I was just thinking today about those who believe that one no longer has "original sin" if one is baptized. Being a Confessional Lutheran (or a true "catholic," if you will), I naturally know this to be false doctrine, and I will prove it to be false. Rome (i.e the "Catholic" church) asserts that we only need confess willful sins, since original sin has been dealt with by baptism and no longer

Beloved in the Lordnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2484737238139164347.post-15560625072366211262008-06-18T13:40:00.000-07:002008-06-18T14:09:05.848-07:00

Is it just me or do Democrats seem to have a very naive understanding of the world? It seems like the Democratic party is made up of two kinds of people: (1) Liberals who love and revel in sin and evil, and (2) Socialists who have good intentions but are naive to the existence of sin and evil, or at least to the extent that it exists in the human heart and the world. I'm not sure which category

Beloved in the Lordnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2484737238139164347.post-24648507147506084012008-06-15T18:17:00.000-07:002008-06-18T14:13:48.421-07:00

Apparently several African American conservatives/Republicans have been indicating that they may vote for, will vote for, will find it very tempting to vote for, or will find it very difficult NOT to vote for Obama because he is African American. Their reasoning is that having an African American voted into office as the President of our country would show we've made significant progress through

Beloved in the Lordnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2484737238139164347.post-65935257185527510202008-06-11T13:46:00.000-07:002008-06-16T10:52:08.032-07:00

I was flipping through the channels yesterday and happened across Joel Osteen giving a sermon, so I watched for a bit. Though I admittedly didn't watch the entire sermon, I noticed that he didn't mention Jesus. He mentioned God a lot. But his message was very simply one of karma (what goes around, comes around - ala 'My Name is Earl'). This is not really a Christian principle, per se; it is a

Beloved in the Lordnoreply@blogger.com0